Table 37.4: Evidence of the Efficacy of Different Regimens for Tinea Capitis

Evidence of the Efficacy of Different Regimens for Tinea Capitis
Treatment, level of evidence, cost (manufacturer, formulation, average wholesale price)EvidenceNumber of people in studyResultsComments
Benzoic acid compound (Whitfield's ointment)SFTRETLevel of evidence: IIIInvestigator-blinded RCT (versus miconazole cream) (Wilmington, Aly, and Frieden 1996)41Mycological cure: 12/20 using benzoic acid compound and 10/19 using miconazole cream
  • Neither treatment is fully efficacious

Cost: not foundObservational study (Hay and others 1996)Prevalence dropped from 7.8 percent to 5.8 percent (p < 0.05)
  • Prevalence study of dermatophyto-mycoses in rural schools

  • After institution of treatment by 12 trained community health workers, only prevalence of tinea capitis dropped significantly

GriseofulvinSFTRETLevel of evidence: IIISFTRETCost:
  • Pedinol, tablets, 125 mg, US$63.00 for 100 tablets

  • Martec, tablets, 125 mg, US$34.10 for 100 tablets

Multicenter, single- blinded, RCT (versus terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole) (Wright and Robertson 1986)200Effective treatment: 46/50 (92 percent) griseofulvin, 47/50 (94 percent) terbinafine, 43/50 (86 percent) itraconazole, 42/50 (84 percent) fluconazole (p = 0.33)
  • ITT analysis performed

  • Griseofulvin for six weeks similar in efficacy to terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole for two to three weeks

Single-cohort retrospective analysis (Schmeller, Baumgartner, and Dzikus 1997)47460.7 percent responded well; 39.3 percent returned less than eight months later; 10.7 percent had a recurrence later
  • Observation over a two-year period

  • Conclusions: griseofulvin may be ineffective in one-third or more patients

Multicenter, open-label, RCT (four weeks terbinafine versus eight weeks griseofulvin) (Gupta and others 2001)210No statistically significant differences (cure = 67 percent in both groups); however, graphical presentation of data demonstrates a slightly higher proportion of patients in terbinafine group achieved "cure" earlier
  • 147 patients were evaluable; no ITT

  • Four weeks of treatment with oral terbinafine had a similar efficacy to eight weeks of treatment with griseofulvin

Parallel-group, multi-center, double-blind RCT (versus terbinafine) (Abdel-Rahman, Nahata, and Powell 1997)134Terbinafine for six weeks had a similar efficacy to griseofulvin
  • Four oral terbinafine groups (6, 8, 10, or 12 weeks) compared with 12 weeks of griseofulvin

  • ITT analysis performed

  • Six weeks of terbinafine could represent an alternative to griseofulvin

Double-blind RCT (versus terbinafine) (Fuller and others 2001)50Week 8: 76 percent griseofulvin and 72 percent terbinafine (not statistically significant);SFTRETweek 12: 44 percent griseofulvin and 76 percent terbinafine (p < 0.05)
  • Outcome: cure rates at weeks 8 and 12

  • Terbinafine is a good alternative for less-frequent recurrences

Double-blind RCT (versus itraconazole) (Lipozencic and others 2002)3588 percent itraconazole versus 88 percent griseofulvin
  • Tinea corporis and tinea capitis evaluated together

  • Outcome measure: cure

  • 34 patients evaluable for efficacy; no ITT

  • Two griseofulvin patients discontinued therapy because of vomiting

  • Itraconazole has the same efficacy as griseofulvin and fewer side effects

Source: Authors.

ITT = intention to treat; p = probability; RCT = randomized clinical trial.