51. Cost–Effectiveness of Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions

Table 51.5: Summary of the Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions

Summary of the Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions
Conditions and treatment optionsConsidered cost-effective in developed countries?aGenerally recommended for developing countries?bReferencesAdditional comments
Osteoporosis
Primary prevention
Physical activityNoYes (for low-cost interventions)Katzmarzyk, Gledhill, and Shephard 2000; Geelhoed, Harris, and Prince 1994; Patrick and others 2001Based on consensus
Calcium plus vitamin DYesYesWillis 2002
HRTYesGeelhoed, Harris, and Prince 1994; Armstrong and others 2001; Kanis and others 2002
RaloxifeneNoNoArmstrong and others 2001; Kanis and others 2002Based on evidence
Secondary prevention
ScreeningNoNoNorlund 1996
Calcium and calcium plus vitamin DYesYesKanis and others 2002
HRTYesYesFleurence, Torgerson, and Reid 2002; Kanis and others 2002Differences in life expectancy and incidence of OP will affect age at which recommended
RaloxifeneNoNoKanis and others 2002
Calcitonin, alendronate, and biphosphonatesNoNoCoyle and others 2001; Kanis and others 2002
FluorideNoNoKanis and others 2002
AlfacalcidolNoNoKanis and others 2002More randomized clinic trials needed
Osteoarthritis
Primary preventionNo evidenceYesBased on consensus
Secondary prevention
Education programNoFurther research neededLord and others 1999
Exercise programNo evidenceLow-cost programs may be usefulPatrick and others 2001
Nonselective NSAIDsNo for nabumetoneMcCabe and others 1998
Gastroprotective agentsYes, but several qualifiersVan Dieten and others 2000; Gabriel, Campion, and O'Fallon 1994
Synovial fluid replacementYesNoTorrance and others 2002Different comparators, relative price
Tertiary interventions
Total hip arthroplastyYesChang, Pellissier, and Hazen 1996
Knee replacementYesSegal and others 2004
Rheumatoid arthritis
Inpatient or outpatientNo evidence
Telephone help lineYesYesNordstrom and others 1996; Hughes and others 2002With good communications and low levels of access to medical care
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
AuranofinNot effectiveNoThompson and others 1988
Cyclosporine, azathioprine, D-penicillamineEqual efficacy; cyclosporine should be used after cheaper, more effective drugsNoAnis and others 1996Cost, monitoring, and adverse events
Combination therapyYes, in some studiesPossiblyVerhoeven and others 1998
BiologicsNo dataNoNeed trials in developing countries, but current costs are prohibitive
CorticosteroidsYesPossiblyBae and others 2003Side effects
Low back pain
Back schoolsNo evidenceNoVan Tulder 2003
MassageLittle evidenceYes, if low costFurlan and others 2002
Early interventionsYesYesGatchel and others 2003Depends on labor market conditions
Ankylosing spondylitis
Spa exerciseYes, but ICERs were sensitive to indirect costsNoVan Tubergen and others 2002Does not provide compelling evidence
BiologicsNoNoUnattractive because of their high price

Source: Authors.

a. Based on a cost-effectiveness threshold value of approximately US$30,000 or other favorable quantitative data on costs and benefits.

b. Based on authors' judgment of generally favorable/unfavorable cost-effectiveness evidence. See text for precise cost-effectiveness (for example, cost per QALY) data.